首页> 外文OA文献 >Harmonization of the quantitative determination of volatile fatty acids profile in aqueous matrix samples by direct injection using gas chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography techniques: Multi-laboratory validation study
【2h】

Harmonization of the quantitative determination of volatile fatty acids profile in aqueous matrix samples by direct injection using gas chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography techniques: Multi-laboratory validation study

机译:采用气相色谱和高效液相色谱技术直接进样定量测定水基质样品中挥发性脂肪酸谱的多样性:多实验室验证研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The performance parameters of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) measurements were assessed for the first time by a multi-laboratory validation study among 13 laboratories. Two chromatographic techniques (GC and HPLC) and two quantification methods such as external and internal standard (ESTD/ISTD) were combined in three different methodologies GC/ESTD, HPLC/ESTD and GC/ISTD. Linearity evaluation of the calibration functions in a wide concentration range (10-1000mg/L) was carried out using different statistical parameters for the goodness of fit. Both chromatographic techniques were considered similarly accurate. The use of GC/ISTD, despite showing similar analytical performance to the other methodologies, can be considered useful for the harmonization of VFAs analytical methodology taking into account the normalization of slope values used for the calculation of VFAs concentrations. Acceptance criteria for VFAs performance parameters of the multi-laboratory validation study should be established as follows: (1) instrument precision (RSDINST≤1.5%); (2) linearity (R2≥0.998; RSDSENSITIVITY≤4%; REMAX≤8%; REAVER≤ 3%); (3) precision (RSD≤1.5%); (4) trueness (recovery of 97-103%); (5) LOD (≤3mg/L); and (6) LOQ (10mg/L)
机译:挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)测量的性能参数是通过13个实验室的多实验室验证研究首次评估的。将两种色谱技术(GC和HPLC)和两种定量方法(例如内标和内标(ESTD / ISTD))组合在三种不同的方法GC / ESTD,HPLC / ESTD和GC / ISTD中。使用不同的统计参数进行拟合优度,在较宽的浓度范围(10-1000mg / L)内对校准函数进行线性评估。两种色谱技术均被认为具有相似的准确性。尽管GC / ISTD的分析性能与其他方法相似,但考虑到用于计算VFA浓度的斜率值的归一化,仍被认为有助于VFA分析方法的统一。多实验室验证研究中VFA性能参数的接受标准应建立如下:(1)仪器精度(RSDINST≤1.5%); (2)线性(R2≥0.998;RSDSENSITIVITY≤4%;REMAX≤8%;REAVER≤3%); (3)精度(RSD≤1.5%); (4)真实性(回收率97-103%); (5)检测限(≤3mg/ L);和(6)LOQ(10mg / L)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号